|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
29/09/2014 |
Actualizado : |
04/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
PÉREZ-CLARIGET, R.; GARESE-RAFFO, J.A.,; FLEISCHMANN-TECHERA, R.; GANZÁBAL, A.; GONZÁLEZ-STAGNARO, C. |
Afiliación : |
ANDRES RICARDO GANZABAL PLANINICH, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Estrus synchronization in goats during reproductive season: Use of medroxiprogesterone acetate sponges or prostaglandin after five days of estrus detection . |
Título : |
Sincronización de celos en cabras en estación reproductiva: Uso de esponjas de medroxiprogesterona o aplicación de prostaglandina después de cinco días de detección de celos. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia, 2012, v.22, no.3, p.245-251. |
Descripción física : |
2-s2.0-84860815855 |
ISSN : |
0798-2259 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Article history: Recibido: 21 september 2011 / Aceptado: 29 february 2012. |
Contenido : |
RESUMEN.
El objetivo del presente trabajo fue comparar durante la estación reproductiva la utilización de esponjas intravaginales de medroxiacetato de progesterona (MAP) sin la asociación de eCG con una dosis de un análogo de prostaglandinas (PG) en cabras lecheras que no habían manifestado celo durante los cinco días (d) previos. Sesenta y siete cabras, adultas y secas, Criolla (C), Anglo Nubian (N), Saanen (S) y mestizas (M) se asignaron al azar según sus genotipos a los siguientes tratamientos: Grupo-MAP (n=36): esponja intravaginal conteniendo 60 mg de MAP durante 14 d o Grupo-PG (n=31): una dosis de 200 µg de delprostenate a cabras que no habían manifestado celo durante los cinco días previos. El celo se detectó a corral dos veces/d durante los cinco días post-tratamiento y una vez/día hasta 22 d después. Las cabras fueron servidas por monta natural controlada en corral al momento del celo detectado y 24 horas (h) después. Los resultados reproductivos fueron analizados usando modelos generalizados (procedimiento GENMOD de SAS). El modelo incluyó los efectos del tratamiento, el grupo genético (C y M vs. N y S) y su interacción. El tratamiento hormonal no influyó en la expresión de celo (100%), ni en la tasa de no retorno en celo a los 21 d (GrupoMAP: 68% vs. Grupo-PG: 54%), como tampoco sobre la fertilidad (cabras paridas/cabras tratadas: Grupo MAP: 55% vs. Grupo-PG: 46%) y sobre la prolificidad (crías nacidas/cabras paridas: Grupo-MAP: 1,47 vs. Grupo-PG: 1,33). El grupo gené- tico solo afectó la prolificidad, C y M: 1,2 vs. N y S: 1,51 (P=0,054). Un alto porcentaje de cabras de ambos grupos retornaron en celo 5-10 d después (ciclos estrales cortos): Grupo-MAP: 70% vs. Grupo-PG: 75%.
ABSTRACT.
The aim of the present work was to compare the use of intravaginal sponges containing medroxiprogesterone acetate (MAP) with a single dose of prostaglandine (PG) on dairy goats which had not shown estrous signs during the previous five days (d) for estrus synchronization during the reproductive season. Sixty-seven adult non-lactating Criollas (C), Anglo-Nubian (N), Saanen (S) and Crossbred (Cr) goats were randomly assigned taking into account their genotype to: Group-MAP (n = 36) intravaginal sponges containing 60 mg of MAP during 14 d and Group-PG: (n = 31) 200 ?g of delprostenate to goats showing no signs of estrus during previous five days. Estrus was detected in an pen twice a day during five days after treatment and once a day thereafter during 22 d. Goats were bred in a pen by natural service after oestrus detection and 24 hours (h) later. Data were analyzed using the generalized model (PROC GENMOD of SAS). The model included the effects of treat-ments, genetic group (C and Cr vs. N and S) and their interaction. Hormonal treatments did not influence the 100% of goats showing estrus during 120 h after treatments (100% for both groups), non return to estrus after 21 d (Group-MAP: 68% vs. Group PG: 54%) or kidding rate (kidding goats/treated goats: Group-MAP: 55% vs. Group PG: 46%), or litter size (number of kids/kidding goats: Group-MAP: 1.5 vs. Group-PG: 1.3). The genetic group only influenced the litter size (C and Cr: 1.1 vs. N and S: 1.5; P=0.054). A great percentage of goats of both groups returned to estrous 5-10 d later (short oestrus cycle): Group-MAP: 70% vs. Group-PG: 75%. MenosRESUMEN.
El objetivo del presente trabajo fue comparar durante la estación reproductiva la utilización de esponjas intravaginales de medroxiacetato de progesterona (MAP) sin la asociación de eCG con una dosis de un análogo de prostaglandinas (PG) en cabras lecheras que no habían manifestado celo durante los cinco días (d) previos. Sesenta y siete cabras, adultas y secas, Criolla (C), Anglo Nubian (N), Saanen (S) y mestizas (M) se asignaron al azar según sus genotipos a los siguientes tratamientos: Grupo-MAP (n=36): esponja intravaginal conteniendo 60 mg de MAP durante 14 d o Grupo-PG (n=31): una dosis de 200 µg de delprostenate a cabras que no habían manifestado celo durante los cinco días previos. El celo se detectó a corral dos veces/d durante los cinco días post-tratamiento y una vez/día hasta 22 d después. Las cabras fueron servidas por monta natural controlada en corral al momento del celo detectado y 24 horas (h) después. Los resultados reproductivos fueron analizados usando modelos generalizados (procedimiento GENMOD de SAS). El modelo incluyó los efectos del tratamiento, el grupo genético (C y M vs. N y S) y su interacción. El tratamiento hormonal no influyó en la expresión de celo (100%), ni en la tasa de no retorno en celo a los 21 d (GrupoMAP: 68% vs. Grupo-PG: 54%), como tampoco sobre la fertilidad (cabras paridas/cabras tratadas: Grupo MAP: 55% vs. Grupo-PG: 46%) y sobre la prolificidad (crías nacidas/cabras paridas: Grupo-MAP: 1,47 vs. Grupo-PG: 1,33). El grup... Presentar Todo |
Thesagro : |
CABRAS; CICLOS DE PRODUCCIÓN; MAP; PROSTAGLANDINAS; SINCRONIZACIÓN DE CELOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3346/1/Ganzabal-A.-2012.-Rev.Cientifica-FCV-LUZ-v.223-p.245-251.pdf
http://www.saber.ula.ve/handle/123456789/35162
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04542naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1050704 005 2019-10-04 008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0798-2259 100 1 $aPÉREZ-CLARIGET, R. 240 $aSincronización de celos en cabras en estación reproductiva: Uso de esponjas de medroxiprogesterona o aplicación de prostaglandina después de cinco días de detección de celos. 245 $aEstrus synchronization in goats during reproductive season$bUse of medroxiprogesterone acetate sponges or prostaglandin after five days of estrus detection .$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2012 300 $c2-s2.0-84860815855 500 $aArticle history: Recibido: 21 september 2011 / Aceptado: 29 february 2012. 520 $aRESUMEN. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue comparar durante la estación reproductiva la utilización de esponjas intravaginales de medroxiacetato de progesterona (MAP) sin la asociación de eCG con una dosis de un análogo de prostaglandinas (PG) en cabras lecheras que no habían manifestado celo durante los cinco días (d) previos. Sesenta y siete cabras, adultas y secas, Criolla (C), Anglo Nubian (N), Saanen (S) y mestizas (M) se asignaron al azar según sus genotipos a los siguientes tratamientos: Grupo-MAP (n=36): esponja intravaginal conteniendo 60 mg de MAP durante 14 d o Grupo-PG (n=31): una dosis de 200 µg de delprostenate a cabras que no habían manifestado celo durante los cinco días previos. El celo se detectó a corral dos veces/d durante los cinco días post-tratamiento y una vez/día hasta 22 d después. Las cabras fueron servidas por monta natural controlada en corral al momento del celo detectado y 24 horas (h) después. Los resultados reproductivos fueron analizados usando modelos generalizados (procedimiento GENMOD de SAS). El modelo incluyó los efectos del tratamiento, el grupo genético (C y M vs. N y S) y su interacción. El tratamiento hormonal no influyó en la expresión de celo (100%), ni en la tasa de no retorno en celo a los 21 d (GrupoMAP: 68% vs. Grupo-PG: 54%), como tampoco sobre la fertilidad (cabras paridas/cabras tratadas: Grupo MAP: 55% vs. Grupo-PG: 46%) y sobre la prolificidad (crías nacidas/cabras paridas: Grupo-MAP: 1,47 vs. Grupo-PG: 1,33). El grupo gené- tico solo afectó la prolificidad, C y M: 1,2 vs. N y S: 1,51 (P=0,054). Un alto porcentaje de cabras de ambos grupos retornaron en celo 5-10 d después (ciclos estrales cortos): Grupo-MAP: 70% vs. Grupo-PG: 75%. ABSTRACT. The aim of the present work was to compare the use of intravaginal sponges containing medroxiprogesterone acetate (MAP) with a single dose of prostaglandine (PG) on dairy goats which had not shown estrous signs during the previous five days (d) for estrus synchronization during the reproductive season. Sixty-seven adult non-lactating Criollas (C), Anglo-Nubian (N), Saanen (S) and Crossbred (Cr) goats were randomly assigned taking into account their genotype to: Group-MAP (n = 36) intravaginal sponges containing 60 mg of MAP during 14 d and Group-PG: (n = 31) 200 ?g of delprostenate to goats showing no signs of estrus during previous five days. Estrus was detected in an pen twice a day during five days after treatment and once a day thereafter during 22 d. Goats were bred in a pen by natural service after oestrus detection and 24 hours (h) later. Data were analyzed using the generalized model (PROC GENMOD of SAS). The model included the effects of treat-ments, genetic group (C and Cr vs. N and S) and their interaction. Hormonal treatments did not influence the 100% of goats showing estrus during 120 h after treatments (100% for both groups), non return to estrus after 21 d (Group-MAP: 68% vs. Group PG: 54%) or kidding rate (kidding goats/treated goats: Group-MAP: 55% vs. Group PG: 46%), or litter size (number of kids/kidding goats: Group-MAP: 1.5 vs. Group-PG: 1.3). The genetic group only influenced the litter size (C and Cr: 1.1 vs. N and S: 1.5; P=0.054). A great percentage of goats of both groups returned to estrous 5-10 d later (short oestrus cycle): Group-MAP: 70% vs. Group-PG: 75%. 650 $aCABRAS 650 $aCICLOS DE PRODUCCIÓN 650 $aMAP 650 $aPROSTAGLANDINAS 650 $aSINCRONIZACIÓN DE CELOS 700 1 $aGARESE-RAFFO, J.A., 700 1 $aFLEISCHMANN-TECHERA, R. 700 1 $aGANZÁBAL, A. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-STAGNARO, C. 773 $tRevista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia, 2012$gv.22, no.3, p.245-251.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
06/12/2022 |
Actualizado : |
06/12/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
DE SANTIAGO, F.; BARRIOS, M.; D'ANATRO, A.; GARCÍA, L.F.; MAILHOS, A.; POMPOZZI, G.; REHERMANN, S.; SIMÓ, M.; TESITORE, G.; DE MELLO, F.T.; VALTIERRA, V.; BLUMETTO, O. |
Afiliación : |
MARÍA FERNANDA DE SANTIAGO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARGENNY BARRIOS, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; ALEJANDRO D'ANATRO, Laboratorio de Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo CP 11400, Uruguay; LUIS FERNANDO GARCÍA, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Ruta 8 km 282, Treinta y Tres CP 33000, Uruguay; ARY MAILHOS, Laboratorio de Botánica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo CP 12900, Uruguay; GABRIEL POMPOZZI, Laboratorio de Entomología, IADIZA (CCT CONICET-Mendoza), Mendoza CP 5500, Argentina; SOFÍA REHERMANN, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; MIGUEL SIMÓ, Sección Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo CP 11400, Uruguay; GIANCARLO TESITORE, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; FRANCO TEIXEIRA DE MELLO, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; VICTORIA VALTIERRA, Laboratorio de Botánica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo CP 12900, Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
From theory to practice: can LEAP/FAO biodiversity assessment guidelines be a useful tool for knowing the environmental status of livestock systems? |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Sustainability, 2022, Volume 14, Issue 23, e16259. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316259 |
ISSN : |
EISSN 2071-1050 |
DOI : |
10.3390/su142316259 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 6 November 2022; Revised 29 November 2022; Accepted 29 November 2022; Published 6 December 2022. -- Academic Editor: Andrea Pezzuolo. -- LICENSE: Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Biodiversity loss is a global concern, and agriculture is one of the economic sectors responsible for this impact. The assessment of ecosystems under the influence of livestock production is essential for knowing their integrity and ability to provide ecosystem services. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the application of LEAP/FAO guidelines for quantitative assessment of biodiversity in the livestock sector at the local scale (farm level) in a group of six study cases in Uruguay. A set of 20 indicators was used, including seven key thematic issues: habitat protection, habitat change, wildlife conservation, invasive species, pollution, aquatic biodiversity, off-farm feed, and landscape-scale conservation. The results show that the LEAP biodiversity assessment guidelines can be useful to characterize the state of ecosystems under pastoral use and some specific components of their biodiversity, as well as assess the interaction of the production system with the environment and plan management accordingly. This work also provides an analysis of the methodology used and recommendations to facilitate its application by the sector. The results from the application of the indicators show a great deal of wild biodiversity that uses grazing systems based on native grasslands as habitats and the acceptable integrity of these ecosystems. On average, farms have 83% of their native ecosystem, with a value of 3.5 for the Ecosystem Integrity Index. In terms of the richness of different groups, there was an average number of species of 112 herbaceous plants, 48 woody plants, 48 spiders, 150 birds, and 14 fish. The main goal of this work is to help in the wider application of the guidelines by facilitating decisions about methodology, necessary resources, and technical support. Moreover, another goal is to show the importance of native grasslands-based livestock systems for biodiversity conservation. Copyright © 2022 by the authors. MenosABSTRACT.- Biodiversity loss is a global concern, and agriculture is one of the economic sectors responsible for this impact. The assessment of ecosystems under the influence of livestock production is essential for knowing their integrity and ability to provide ecosystem services. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the application of LEAP/FAO guidelines for quantitative assessment of biodiversity in the livestock sector at the local scale (farm level) in a group of six study cases in Uruguay. A set of 20 indicators was used, including seven key thematic issues: habitat protection, habitat change, wildlife conservation, invasive species, pollution, aquatic biodiversity, off-farm feed, and landscape-scale conservation. The results show that the LEAP biodiversity assessment guidelines can be useful to characterize the state of ecosystems under pastoral use and some specific components of their biodiversity, as well as assess the interaction of the production system with the environment and plan management accordingly. This work also provides an analysis of the methodology used and recommendations to facilitate its application by the sector. The results from the application of the indicators show a great deal of wild biodiversity that uses grazing systems based on native grasslands as habitats and the acceptable integrity of these ecosystems. On average, farms have 83% of their native ecosystem, with a value of 3.5 for the Ecosystem Integrity Index. In terms of the ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA; BIODIVERSITY; GRASSLAND; LEAP guidelines; LIVESTOCK. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16907/1/sustainability-14-16259.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03461naa a2200349 a 4500 001 1063823 005 2022-12-06 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $aEISSN 2071-1050 024 7 $a10.3390/su142316259$2DOI 100 1 $aDE SANTIAGO, F. 245 $aFrom theory to practice$bcan LEAP/FAO biodiversity assessment guidelines be a useful tool for knowing the environmental status of livestock systems?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received 6 November 2022; Revised 29 November 2022; Accepted 29 November 2022; Published 6 December 2022. -- Academic Editor: Andrea Pezzuolo. -- LICENSE: Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 520 $aABSTRACT.- Biodiversity loss is a global concern, and agriculture is one of the economic sectors responsible for this impact. The assessment of ecosystems under the influence of livestock production is essential for knowing their integrity and ability to provide ecosystem services. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the application of LEAP/FAO guidelines for quantitative assessment of biodiversity in the livestock sector at the local scale (farm level) in a group of six study cases in Uruguay. A set of 20 indicators was used, including seven key thematic issues: habitat protection, habitat change, wildlife conservation, invasive species, pollution, aquatic biodiversity, off-farm feed, and landscape-scale conservation. The results show that the LEAP biodiversity assessment guidelines can be useful to characterize the state of ecosystems under pastoral use and some specific components of their biodiversity, as well as assess the interaction of the production system with the environment and plan management accordingly. This work also provides an analysis of the methodology used and recommendations to facilitate its application by the sector. The results from the application of the indicators show a great deal of wild biodiversity that uses grazing systems based on native grasslands as habitats and the acceptable integrity of these ecosystems. On average, farms have 83% of their native ecosystem, with a value of 3.5 for the Ecosystem Integrity Index. In terms of the richness of different groups, there was an average number of species of 112 herbaceous plants, 48 woody plants, 48 spiders, 150 birds, and 14 fish. The main goal of this work is to help in the wider application of the guidelines by facilitating decisions about methodology, necessary resources, and technical support. Moreover, another goal is to show the importance of native grasslands-based livestock systems for biodiversity conservation. Copyright © 2022 by the authors. 653 $aÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA 653 $aBIODIVERSITY 653 $aGRASSLAND 653 $aLEAP guidelines 653 $aLIVESTOCK 700 1 $aBARRIOS, M. 700 1 $aD'ANATRO, A. 700 1 $aGARCÍA, L.F. 700 1 $aMAILHOS, A. 700 1 $aPOMPOZZI, G. 700 1 $aREHERMANN, S. 700 1 $aSIMÓ, M. 700 1 $aTESITORE, G. 700 1 $aDE MELLO, F.T. 700 1 $aVALTIERRA, V. 700 1 $aBLUMETTO, O. 773 $tSustainability, 2022, Volume 14, Issue 23, e16259. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316259
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|